Equívocos literários
“O deserto dos tártaros” e “O advogado do diabo” (sobre vaidade e arrogância)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60106/rsbppa.v1i1.10Keywords:
Litetature, Psychoanalysis, Vanity, Arrogance, Projetive IdentificationAbstract
The author think to be a mistake, unless under the psychoanalytic point of view, in two pieces of literature, Dino Buzzati’s “Il Deserto dei Tartari” (English version unknown) and Andrew Lederman’s “He imagines that what the romancists thinks to be vanity they really shows examples of arrogance. His arguments are discussed under the psychoanalytic focus and, using the material of the romance and of the novel and some clinical material, discuss arrogance, psychoanalytically, its diference of vanity and the importance of its perception in the material of the patient and, above all, in the psychologic state of the psychoanalyst.
Downloads
References
FREUD, S. (1920). Beyond the Pleasure Principle. S.E., XVIII, 7.
FREUD, S. (1937). Analysis Terminable and Interminable. S.E., XXIII, 209.
GIOVACCHINI, P. (1990). Contemporary Perspectives on Technique. J. Aronson, N. York.
OGDEN, T. (1989). The Primitive Edge of Experience. Jason Aronson, N. York.
OGDEN, T. (1994). Subjects of Analysis, Karnac Books, London.
TUSTIN, F. (1990). Barreiras Autísticas em Pacientes Neuróticos. Artes Médicas, P. Alegre.
VOLKAN, V. (1995). The Infantil Psychotic Self and its Fates. Jason Aronson, Northvale.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I attribute the copyrights that belong to me, on this work, to SBPdePA, which may use and publish it by the means it deems appropriate, including on the Internet or in any other computer processing.