Some new perspectives on unsconscious phantasies

Authors

  • James S. Grotstein Associação Psicanalítica Americana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60106/rsbppa.v5i1.110

Keywords:

Unsconscious phantasy, Alpha-function, Unconscious, Evolutions of “O”, Dream

Abstract

The author proposes some new perspectives on unconscious phantasies. He tries to demonstrate that Systems Cs. and Ucs. do not function conflictually but rather complementarily as binary oppositions. System Ucs. has two major components, the unrepressed Ucs. and the dynamic or repressed Ucs., the former of which is the inherent platonic Ucs. and the latter of which is the domain of repressed memories of actual experiences. The author postulates that the latter is the storehouse for mental processing via dreams and phantasies that originate from the activities of the former. Systems Ucs. and Cs. function as cooperative oppositional pincers to intercept “O” (the Absolute Truth about Ultimate Reality). Unconscious phantasy formation, i.e., the workings of alpha functioning, constitutes unconscious thinking. The “actors’ who enact unconscious phantasies are variegated phantoms or demons (both positive and negative) who perform a dramatic role hoping all the while that someone is there who can interpret their pantomime so that they can, like the sphinx in Oedipus Rex, be released and return to repertory. Psychoanalytic interpretation of unconscious phantasy confirms and completes them, not merely discrediting them. Dreams and unconscious phantasies are our “silent service”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

James S. Grotstein, Associação Psicanalítica Americana

Membro Titular da Associação Psicanalítica Americana (APsaA). Membro Titular do Centro Psicanalítico da Califórnia (PCC).

References

BION, W.R. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Heinemann.

______. (1965). Transformations. London: Heinemann.

______. (1970). Attention and interpretation. London: Tavistock Publications.

______. (1992). Cogitations. London: Karnac Books.

BREUER, J.; FREUD, S. (1893-1895). Studies on hysteria. Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press, 1955. V.2, p.1-309.

DAMASIO, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.

ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA (1997). CD-ROM.

FREUD, S. (1913[1912-1913]). Totem and taboo. Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press, 1957. V.13, p.1-64.

______. (1915a). Repression. Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press, 1957. V.14, p.141-158.

______. (1915b). The unconscious. Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press, 1957. V.14, p. 159-215.

______. (1915c). Instincts and their vicissitudes. Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press, 1957. V.14, p.109-140.

______. (1923). The ego and the id. Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press, 1961. V.19, p.3-66.

GROTSTEIN, J.S. (1978). Inner space: its dimensions and its coordinance. Internat. J. Psycho-Anal., v.59, p.55-61.

______. (1997). “Internal Objects” or “Chimeral Monsters?”: The Demonic “Third Forms” of the Internal World. The Journal of Analytic Psychology, V.42, p.47-80.

______. (1998). The numinous and immanent nature of the psychoanalytic subject. Journal of Analytical Psychology, v. 43, p.41-68.

______. (2000). Who is the dreamer who dreams the dream? a study of psychic presences. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press. ISAACS, S. (1952). The nature and function of phantasy. In: Developments in psycho-analysis. London: Hogarth Press. JAYNES, J. (1976). The origins of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

JUNG, C.G. (1934). Archetypes and the collective unconscious: collected works. New York: Bollinger, 1959. (Series XX)

KING, P.; STEINER, R. (Ed.). (1992). The Freud-Klein controversies: 1941-1945. London: Karnac Books.

KLEIN, M. (1929). Personification in the play of children. In: Contributions to psycho-analysis: 1921-1945. London: Hogarth Press, 1950. p.215-226.

LACAN, J. (1966). Écrits: 1949-1960. New York: W.W. Norton, 1977.

LICHTENSTEIN, H. (1961). Identity and sexuality. Journal of the Am. Psychoanalytic Assoc., v. 9, p.179-260.

LLINÁS, R. (2001). I of the Vortex: from neurons to self. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

MATTE-BLANCO, I. (1975). The unconscious as infinite sets. London: Duckworth Press.

______. (1981). Reflecting with Bion. In: GROTSTEIN, J.S. Do I dare disturb the universe? a memorial to Wilfred R. Bion. Beverly Hills: Caesura Press. p. 489-528.

______. (1988). Thinking, feeling, and being: clinical reflections on the fundamental antinomy of human beings. London/New York: Tavistock and Routledge.

ORANGE, D.M.; ATWOOD, G.E.; STOLOROW, R.D. (1997). Working intersubjectively: contextualism in psychoanalytic practice. Hillsdale, NJ/ London: Analytic Press.

SANDLER, J.; SANDLER, A.-M. (1984). The past unconscious, the present unconscious, and interpretation of the transference. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, v.4, p.367-399.

______. (1987). The past unconscious, the present one, and the vicissitudes of guilt. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, v.64, p.413-425.

SEGAL, H. (1957). Notes on symbol formation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, v.38, p.391-397.

______. (1981). Notes on symbol formation. In: The work of Hanna Segal: a kleinian approach to clinical practice. New York/London: Jason Aronson. p. 49-68.

SHLAIN, L. (1998). The alphabet and the goddess: the conflict between words and images. New York: Penguin/Arcana.

SCHORE, A. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: the neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

SPILLIUS, E.B. (2001). Freud and Klein on the concept of phantasy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 82, p.361-373.

Published

2003-03-29

How to Cite

Grotstein, J. S. (2003). Some new perspectives on unsconscious phantasies. Psicanálise - Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Psicanálise De Porto Alegre, 5(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.60106/rsbppa.v5i1.110

Issue

Section

Articles/Essays/Meditations