Why Green?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60106/rsbppa.v11i2.332Keywords:
Drive, Object, RepresentationAbstract
In this work, the author summarizes some of the most important and original Green’s ideas: 1) the analyst’s role as the biggest responsible for the analytic dyad growth; 2) based on first and second Freud’s topics, she gives a different conception of the psychic apparatus, considering the relation between biological and anthropomorphic aspects; 3) major emphasis on negative and the work of negative. Highlighting impulses as an objectalizating function and its removal as an unobjectalizating function, Green gives a fundamental importance to the dialectic between the object’s absence and presence on internal subject representation, leading, for that reason, to its reorganization, as well as its defenses.
Downloads
References
BION, W. Cogitations. London: Karnac Books, 1992.
BION, W. Transformations. London: Maresfield Reprints, 1965.
GREEN, A. El Tiempo Fragmentado. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 2000.
GREEN, A. La Causalité Psychique. Paris: Odile Jacob, 1995.
GREEN, A. Le Discurs Vivant. Paris: Presses Universitaires France, 1973.
GREEN, A. The Dead Mother. London: Routledge, 1999a.
GREEN, A. The Work of the Negative. London: Free Association Books, 1999b.
FREUD, S. (1917). Suplemento Metapsicológico à Teoria dos Sonhos. In: FREUD, S. Obras Psicológicas Completas de Sigmund Freud. E. S. B. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1996. v. XIV.
WINNICOTT, D. W. O Brincar e a Realidade. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1971.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
I attribute the copyrights that belong to me, on this work, to SBPdePA, which may use and publish it by the means it deems appropriate, including on the Internet or in any other computer processing.
