Is there a natural termination for the analysis?

Authors

  • Miguel Leivi Associação Psicanalítica de Buenos Aires

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60106/rsbppa.v6i2.160

Keywords:

Psychoanalitic therapy, End of analysis, Traumatic theory, Ideals

Abstract

The paper proposes some reflections about the difficulties and condictions of the analysis practices nowadays, based on Freud’s paper “Analysis terminable and interminable”, which considers very present yet.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Miguel Leivi, Associação Psicanalítica de Buenos Aires

Membro Titular e Didata da Associação Psicanalítica de Buenos Aires.

References

FREUD, S. (1900). La interpretación de los sueños. In: ______. S.E. v. 5.

______. (1913). La iniciación del tratamiento. In: ______. S.E. v. 12.

______. (1926). Inhibición, síntoma y angustia. In: ______. S.E. v. 20.

______. (1927). El fetichismo. In: ______. S.E. v. 21.

______. (1937). Análisis terminable e interminable. In: ______. S.E. v. 22.

LACAN, J. (1955). Seminario III: Las psicosis. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1984.

LACAN, J. (1956). Seminario IV: La relación de objeto. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1994.

SOLER, C. (1986). Fines del análisis: historia y teoría. In: ______. Finales de análisis. Buenos Aires: Manatial, 1988.

______. (1995). El decir del analista. Buenos Aires: Eolia-Paidós, 1995.

STRACHEY, J. Introducción a Análisis terminable e interminable. In: FREUD, S. S.E. v. 22.

Published

2004-12-05

How to Cite

Leivi, M. (2004). Is there a natural termination for the analysis?. Psicanálise - Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira De Psicanálise De Porto Alegre, 6(2), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.60106/rsbppa.v6i2.160

Issue

Section

Articles/Essays/Meditations